Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Home Depot to recycle compact fluorescent bulbs

According to the NY Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/24/business/24recycling.html?_r=1&ref=business&oref=slogin), Home Depot will now start recycling compact fluorescent bulbs at all locations from all brands. They contain a very slight amount of mercury, so they are not safe to throw out.

This is great news, because no one seems to know what to do with CFL bulbs. Some counties/communities accept them at the county recycling center (Arlington county does here in VA, for instance), but some counties don't have a center that you can take them to.

Hopefully Home Depot will be better with this program than they are with their battery recycling program.

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Amount of food used for ethanol biofuel

I saw a pretty amazing stat while reading an article on the Washington Post a few days ago. "A tank of standard, U.S. corn biofuel blend, called E10, contains enough calories to sustain an adult man for 11 days.". (article at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/17/AR2008061702268_2.html). E10 is only 10% ethanol, so it's pretty staggering that 10% of a full tank uses this many calories.

The gas stations that I go to in Virginia all use an E10 blend, I'm not sure if gas stations in other states use E10 or not. The pumps will have a sticker on them saying that the fuel is a mixture of 10% ethanol. E10 can be used safely in all vehicles, so that is why E10 has become so widely used. With all of this corn being used for biofuels and not for food, do you think it's a coincidence that food prices across the globe have skyrocketed? Just think, about that the next time that you fill your tank up.

GM is really pushing their cars than can use E85 gas. If 10% ethanol blend has something to do with the increased food prices, just think what widespread use of 85% ethanol will do.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

New car gas mileage standards for 2008

The EPA has updated the way they calculate gas mileage for all 2008 model year vehicles. The test uses much more realistic driving conditions, so the fuel economy for most cars dropped by around 2 miles per gallon. In addition to the definite numbers for highway and city driving, they provide ranges for each and a combined average. The EPA put up a really good web site at www.fueleconomy.gov that allows you to enter how many miles per gallon you're getting (by entering in when you buy gas, how many gallons you bought, and how many miles you drove) along with driving habits. Whenever you look at a car's gas mileage, you can see what people are actually getting for gas mileage instead of just what the EPA says. They've also estimated what the gas mileage of cars from 1985 - 2007 would be with the new standards. If you want to find information out about gas mileage, this is definitely the site to do it at!

Sunday, February 24, 2008

Where to recycle batteries (not Home Depot!)

After reading online that all Home Depot locations have a drop off for recycling batteries, I took a dead 9V power tool battery there to be recycled. After all, it would make sense that the store that's probably one of, if not the largest seller of power tools in the country would provide recycling for the large batteries that come with power tools, wouldn't it? After wandering around clueless in the Home Depot looking for the drop off bin, I asked a few employees, and they all said that they no longer do battery recycling. Looks like not enough money is made by recycling batteries.

If you want to know where you can recycle rechargable batteries, you can enter your address / zip code into http://www.rbrc.org/call2recycle/dropoff/index.php, and it will show you a list of all places that are supposed to recycle batteries. The Home Depot that doesn't recycle is listed here, so these places might not recycle batteries. You should probably call the place before you make a trip there to make sure that they recycle.

Using rechargable batteries instead of regular batteries is a great way to reduce waste. But when the batteries die, it's very important to recycle them. http://www.ehso.com/ehshome/batteries.php is a pretty good page that lists all of the problems associated with rechargable batteries in the trash and some statistics. According to the page, 88 percent of mercury in the waste stream is from batteries.

Has anyone else taken batteries to be recycled at stores that are supposed to recycle, only to find out that the store doesn't recycle?

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Cars have been getting bigger and heavier

A lot of my posts here have and will focus on simple things that you can do to help the environment. One of the biggest sources of carbon emissions is your car. This EPA Carbon Emissions Calculator can show you just how many pounds of carbon emissions your car and house cause. Changing your driving habits is a lot more invasive than recycling more but can have a huge positive impact on the environment.

Buying a more fuel efficient car can greatly reduce your carbon emissions, if you don't want to move and get a job close to a subway station. But have you noticed there really aren't too many cars that get really good gas mileage? The Prius, Insight, and Civic hybrids are great, but other than them, which cars get exceptional gas mileage? With the environment in the shape that it's in, you'd think that car companies would really be pushing 40+ mile per gallon cars since the environment is a popular issue now. But we're bombarded with car ads boasting SUV's that get 20 miles per gallon, and big cars that get 30 miles per gallon, like 20 and 30 miles per gallon are actually good numbers.

Technology has advanced so much in the past 20 years, yet the cars from 20 years ago got as good if not better gas mileage than most of today's cars. Why is that? As this AP news article points out, the weight of the average vehicle sold in the U.S. has increased 923 pounds, and the average vehicle's horsepower has increased by 105 since 1987. While I won't comment on the increase in horsepower (who doesn't like more horsepower?), the increase in weight is pretty staggering. A lot of this is from SUV's becoming so popular, they are significantly heavier than cars. But, cars have gotten a lot bigger as well. When I park my relatively new compact car next to a late 80's Corolla or Civic, my car looks much bigger! And a new Honda Accord looks really big parked next to a late 80's Taurus. Take a look at the Wikipedia Honda Civic article, and compare the third generation to the present generation. The third generation (1984-1987) was 150"l x 64"w x 53"h, and the current generation coupe comes in at 175"l x 69"w x 54"h. That's over two feet longer, and five inches wider!

Why don't the car companies make smaller cars? Some of us who care about the environment would take smaller back seats and trunks for better gas mileage. But the car companies just have very few options out there for really small cars. Sure, 35 miles per gallon highway seems pretty good, but cars from 20 years ago got better than that. With the exception of hybrids, which are still a pretty small share of the car market, there's no excuse for the car companies to not have anything that gets better gas mileage than the cars from 20 years ago did.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Where do the presidential candidates stand on environmental issues?

A really good web site that lists where all of the presidential candidates stand on tons of issues is Vote Gopher. The people at this site, which you can join and become a contributor to, scour the media for quotes and voting records for candidates on pretty much any issue you can think of, and then summarize where the candidates stand. Anyone who wants to read what the candidates actually stand for, instead of just listening to the latest gossip on the candidates that the mainstream media reports, should check this site out.

Specifically, you can read about where each candidate stands on environmental issues by going to http://www.votegopher.com/issue.php?issue=3. Click the red tab "Change Candidates" to pick different candidates to view information on. Super Tuesday is only a week away, and the "Potomac Primaries" (Virginia, Maryland, and DC) are two weeks away. If you want to make an informed choice for president, read VoteGopher!

Sunday, January 27, 2008

How to stop getting catalogs in the mail

Along the same lines as my previous post about phone books, another huge source of paper waste and energy to deliver is getting catalogs in the mail. We all get a bunch of catalogs that we probably don't care about in the mail. If you're like me, most of them go straight into the recycling bin without even looking at them. While recycling them is certainly better than throwing them in the trash, the much better approach is to not get the catalogs at all. The environmental benefit of not getting a catalog versus recycling is many times better than the difference for recycling versus throwing out. But no one wants to spend the time to call up each place that you're getting a catalog from to request to be removed from their distribution list.

However, I found out about a really cool web site called Catalog Choice where you can find who you're getting a catalog from, and in two clicks request to stop getting their catalog. Catalog Choice takes care of the rest. There are a huge number of companies that are already honoring their requests, and as the site grows more and more companies will honor their requests. I would highly recommend this site to everyone, the address is http://www.catalogchoice.org/. Note that when you find a company to request removal from, you need to enter a customer number or catalog number in. The site says that it's optional, but every place that I've tried without putting this number in shows that it's been rejected, and the ones where I put this number in are all processing or removed. You can find this number on the back of the catalog above your mailing address typically.